Question: A user video is claimed by two different assets. One asset has ownership in Canada and a match policy of Monetize worldwide. The other asset has ownership worldwide and a match policy of Monetize worldwide. What policy is applied?
- Monetize worldwide
- Track worldwide
- Monetize in Canada, Track everywhere else
- Track in Canada, Monetize everywhere else
Explanation
A match policy can only apply in territories where the claiming partner has valid asset ownership. In Canada, both claimed assets have active monetization coverage, so Monetize applies there. Outside Canada, the Canada-only asset has no ownership, so its monetization rule does not apply. With no applicable monetizing policy from that asset outside its territory, the result falls back to Track outside Canada.
Why the other options are incorrect
Monetize worldwide is incorrect because one claiming asset has ownership only in Canada.
Track worldwide is incorrect because Canada has valid Monetize coverage.
Track in Canada, Monetize everywhere else reverses the territory-based policy result.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3013321
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3369929
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Asset Monetization" page.