Question: When are claims "routed for manual review"?
- When assets have more than one owner
- When specified by a custom policy provided by the partner
- When users dispute or appeal a claim on an uploaded video
- When matches are audiovisual
Explanation
Claims are routed for manual review when a custom policy includes the Route for review action. The policy defines the conditions that trigger review, such as match amount or other available rule conditions. When Content ID finds a match covered by that rule, the claim becomes a potential claim. It remains inactive until the claim is manually reviewed and made active.
Why the other options are incorrect
More than one owner affects ownership and policy application, not automatic manual review routing.
Dispute or appeal is a claim-resolution process, not the trigger for Route for review.
Audiovisual matches can be claimed normally and do not require manual review by default.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/106966
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/106964
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Asset Monetization" page.