We can’t do this without you! Help us stay online and support free content.  Click to Donate

Which policy is applied in a multi-claim scenario when partn

Which policy is applied in a multi-claim scenario when partners have different match policies?

Question: Which policy is applied in a multi-claim scenario when partners have different match policies?

  • YouTube applies the most restrictive policy to the claimed video
  • YouTube applies the least restrictive policy to the claimed video
  • YouTube applies no policy to the claimed video
  • YouTube always applies the Track policy to the claimed video

Explanation

In a multi-claim scenario, YouTube evaluates the active match policies attached to the claimed video. When different policy actions apply, the most restrictive action controls the video outcome. Block is more restrictive than Monetize, and Monetize is more restrictive than Track. This rule ensures that overlapping valid claims produce one enforceable policy result on the claimed video.

Why the other options are incorrect

Least restrictive policy is incorrect because YouTube prioritizes the strongest active enforcement action.

No policy is incorrect because valid active claims still apply policy behavior.

Track policy is incorrect because Track does not override more restrictive active policies.

Source for verification

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3369929

The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Asset Monetization" page.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top