Question: While reviewing disputes, you see a disputed claim made because of a match to a short clip of non-exclusive content included in your otherwise valid reference file. What is the best action for you to take?
- Release the claim and exclude the matched portion from your reference to prevent future matches
- Release the claim and deactivate the reference file
- Reinstate the claim and change your match policy to Block
- Takedown
Explanation
A short non-exclusive segment is not eligible for Content ID matching because the content owner does not control exclusive rights to that portion. Using Release and exclude claim ends the disputed claim on the uploader’s video and prevents the same invalid segment from generating future matches. The rest of the reference can remain active if it contains valid owned material. This keeps claim enforcement focused on content that is eligible under Content ID reference requirements.
Why the other options are incorrect
Deactivate reference is incorrect because the entire reference does not need to be disabled when only one segment is invalid.
Reinstate with block is incorrect because non-exclusive content should not continue to be enforced through a match policy.
Takedown is incorrect because licensed or non-exclusive content should not be escalated to a copyright removal request.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9948004
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2605065
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Content Ownership" page.