What are the implications of selecting the claim option "block outside ownership"?

Question: What are the implications of selecting the claim option "block outside ownership"?

  • Your video will be made unavailable in countries where you don't own the asset.
  • Your video will become Unlisted on your channel.
  • All user videos claimed against the asset will be made unavailable in areas where you don't own the asset.
  • Other parties are unable to add ownership to your asset in territories that you don't own it.

Explanation

Block outside ownership applies to the partner-uploaded video associated with the asset. It makes the video unavailable in territories where the content owner has not declared ownership. This setting helps prevent a channel upload from being viewable in regions where rights are not controlled. It affects the uploaded video’s availability, not ownership claims made by other parties.

Why the other options are incorrect

Unlisted is incorrect because the setting changes territorial availability, not the video privacy status.

User videos is incorrect because this option applies to the partner-uploaded video, not all claimed user uploads.

Other parties is incorrect because the setting does not prevent other owners from declaring valid ownership in territories they control.

Source for verification

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/107129

The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Content Ownership" page.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top