Question: How does copyright apply to a movie review video?
- May be considered fair use to use a very short movie clip to support commentary about the plot or characters.
- Allows a review to add as many pieces of footage from the movie if it’s listed as a movie review.
- Video footage may be used as long as the sound is disabled.
- Prevents any footage from being shown without written consent from the actors who have dialogue.
Explanation
Fair use can allow limited use of copyrighted material when the use adds commentary, criticism, or analysis. A movie review may qualify when a short clip is used to support discussion rather than replace the original work. The evaluation depends on factors such as purpose, amount used, and effect on the market for the copyrighted work. YouTube cannot automatically decide whether a specific review qualifies as fair use.
Why the other options are incorrect
As many pieces of footage is incorrect because labeling a video as a review does not allow unlimited use of copyrighted clips.
Sound disabled is incorrect because removing audio does not automatically make copyrighted footage permissible.
Actor consent is incorrect because copyright permission is generally tied to rights holders, not automatically to every actor with dialogue.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9783148
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2797466
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Content Ownership" page.