Question: A user disputes a claim for music playing in the background of their video. What happens to this disputed claim if you select “Reinstate”?
- Upheld but the claim is set to "none"?.
- Routed to third-party review board for manual investigation.
- Claim becomes active again and partner policy is applied to the video.
- The user who uploaded the content receives notice for violating terms of use.
Explanation
Selecting Reinstate tells YouTube that the rights holder still asserts the disputed Content ID claim. The uploader is notified that the dispute was not accepted. The claim remains governed by the asset’s applicable policy. The uploader may then have the option to appeal, depending on the claim status and workflow.
Why the other options are incorrect
Set to none is incorrect because reinstatement does not remove the applied policy.
Third-party review board is incorrect because YouTube does not route reinstated disputes to an outside review board.
Terms of use notice is incorrect because reinstatement is part of the Content ID dispute process, not a Terms of Service penalty.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2797454
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Content Ownership" page.