Question: Georgette uploads a video that includes a mashup of several songs, including a hit single by Artist B. Content ID claims Georgette’s video on behalf of Artist B’s record label. Georgette disputes the claim, and the label reinstates it. Georgette still doesn’t believe the claim is valid and responds. How could you best describe this claim scenario?
- User-uploaded claim that the user has appealed.
- User-uploaded claim that the claimant has appealed.
- Partner-uploaded claim that the user has disputed.
- Partner-uploaded claim that the claimant has disputed.
Explanation
The claim began from a match against a user’s upload, so it is handled as a Content ID claim on user-uploaded content. Georgette first used the dispute process to challenge the claim. After the claimant reinstated it, her next response is treated as an appeal. This sequence is different from partner-uploaded claiming because the video was not delivered through the rightsholder’s own managed catalog workflow.
Why the other options are incorrect
Claimant has appealed is incorrect because the uploader, not the claimant, escalated after reinstatement.
Partner-uploaded claim is incorrect because the video was uploaded by Georgette, not through the label’s managed delivery.
Claimant has disputed is incorrect because disputes and appeals are actions taken by the uploader against a claim.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2797454?hl=en
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3311596?hl=en
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Music Rights Management" page.