Breanna works at a publishing company and manages her company’s composition rights on YouTube. The company owns the composition rights to “Song XYZ” worldwide, but only has a license with YouTube in the U.S. and Canada. Where should Breanna assert ownership for “Song XYZ” on YouTube?

Question: Breanna works at a publishing company and manages her company’s composition rights on YouTube. The company owns the composition rights to “Song XYZ” worldwide, but only has a license with YouTube in the U.S. and Canada. Where should Breanna assert ownership for “Song XYZ” on YouTube?

  • Only in the U.S. and Canada.
  • Everywhere except for the U.S. and Canada.
  • Worldwide.
  • Nowhere.

Explanation

Ownership should be asserted only where the publisher has both the underlying rights and the relevant YouTube agreement. In YouTube rights management, territorial ownership controls where a Composition asset can be claimed and monetized. Worldwide copyright ownership does not automatically mean worldwide YouTube rights can be administered in Content Manager. U.S. and Canada are the valid territories because those are the territories covered by the company’s YouTube license.

Why the other options are incorrect

Everywhere except for the U.S. and Canada is incorrect because those territories are outside the stated YouTube license.

Worldwide is incorrect because the YouTube license is not worldwide.

Nowhere is incorrect because the company can assert ownership in the licensed territories.

Source for verification

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6175220?hl=en

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/106996?hl=en

The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Music Rights Management" page.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top