Question: Partner A and Partner B share ownership of an asset (in different territories). If Partner A releases a claim on a video, what happens?
- The claim is released for both Partner A and Partner B.
- The claim is routed to Partner B to confirm the release.
- Partner A’s ownership is removed from the asset.
- Partner A's policy is removed, but Partner B's policy remains active.
Explanation
A released claim is removed from the claimed video, not just from one territorial owner’s policy view. For a shared asset, the claim exists at the video-claim level even when ownership is split by territory. Releasing it stops that claim from enforcing policies for all owners connected to that asset claim. This is different from changing asset ownership, which would affect only ownership data.
Why the other options are incorrect
Partner B confirmation is not required when a partner releases the claim.
Partner A’s ownership is not removed because releasing a claim does not edit asset ownership.
Partner A’s policy is not simply removed while Partner B’s remains active because the video-level claim is released.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/106990
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3013321
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Asset Monetization" page.