Question: Partner A set their ownership of an asset in Japan and Partner B set their ownership of the same asset in Korea. Partner A has a match policy of Monetize worldwide. Partner B has a match policy of Track worldwide. If a user video is matched and claimed against this asset, what is the applied policy?
- No policy
- Monetize in Japan, Track in Korea
- Track in Japan and Korea
- Monetize in Japan and Korea
Explanation
YouTube applies a partner’s match policy only where that partner has valid asset ownership. Partner A owns Japan, so Monetize applies there. Partner B owns Korea, so Track applies there. The worldwide policy setting does not extend policy control beyond each partner’s ownership territories.
Why the other options are incorrect
No policy is incorrect because valid ownership and active match policies exist in both territories.
Track in Japan and Korea is incorrect because Partner A’s Monetize policy applies in Japan.
Monetize in Japan and Korea is incorrect because Partner B’s Track policy applies in Korea.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3013321
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3369929
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Asset Monetization" page.