Question: Shawna has no match policy selected for a territory where she owns Asset A. How would this impact a multiple-claim scenario in which another partner has a worldwide Monetize policy for Asset B?
- The video will monetize in Shawna’s territory.
- The video will be tracked in Shawna’s territory.
- The video will be blocked in the other partner’s territory.
- The video will not appear on YouTube until Shawna sets a policy.
Explanation
In a multiple-claim scenario, YouTube applies the active policy from the claiming assets in the affected territory. Shawna’s asset has no selected match policy, so it does not add a more restrictive action in her territory. The other partner’s worldwide Monetize policy remains active for that territory. As a result, the claimed video can monetize rather than being tracked, blocked, or withheld.
Why the other options are incorrect
Tracked is incorrect because no active Track policy is described.
Blocked is incorrect because no Block policy is active in the territory.
Not appear on YouTube is incorrect because a missing match policy does not automatically prevent video availability.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/107129?hl=en
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Music Rights Management" page.