Question: Which of the following is a step you would NOT take to identify bad claims?
- Use filters to identify patterns in bad claims
- Sort assets by active claims to help prioritize
- Create an asset campaign
- Examine your disputed and appealed claims
Explanation
Creating an asset campaign is a promotion workflow, not a claim-quality review workflow. Bad claims are identified by reviewing Content ID claims, claim statuses, and patterns across assets. Sorting by active claims helps prioritize assets that may create the largest claim-quality risk. Disputed and appealed claims are especially useful because they show claims that have already been challenged.
Why the other options are incorrect
Filters help isolate claim patterns by status, asset, policy, and other claim details.
Active claims help prioritize high-impact assets for claim review.
Disputed and appealed claims show claim issues that need investigation and possible action.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/106990
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6078374
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Asset Monetization" page.