Question: Elizabeth runs a music publishing company and needs a group of employees to manage the company’s composition assets on YouTube. However, she wants her direct report, Ron, to oversee the employees’ access to the assets. How could Elizabeth best accomplish this in Content Manager CMS?
- Elizabeth could give Administrator access to Ron, and create roles with more restrictive access for the other employees.
- Elizabeth could give content owner access to Ron, and Administrator access to the other employees.
- Elizabeth could give channel manager access to Ron, and content owner access to the other employees.
- Elizabeth could create an email alias with Administrator access that all employees can use.
Explanation
Administrator access is the appropriate role for managing users and permissions in Content Manager CMS. More restrictive roles let employees work on Composition assets without receiving unnecessary account-level privileges. This follows the YouTube access model where role permissions should match job responsibilities. Shared login credentials are not an appropriate way to manage access or accountability.
Why the other options are incorrect
Content owner access is incorrect because it does not describe the proper user-management role for overseeing employee permissions.
Channel manager access is incorrect because channel-level access is not the correct role for managing composition asset permissions in Content Manager CMS.
Email alias is incorrect because shared administrator credentials prevent individual accountability and proper access control.
Source for verification
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6301188?hl=en
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/106996?hl=en
The answer(s) to the question is highlighted in the BOLD text above. You can also find more questions and answers related to the exams on the "YouTube Music Rights Management" page.